The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal Target 2.2 aspires to end all forms of malnutrition by 2030 by meeting targets, along with eliminating stunting and wasting in all children younger than 5 years. These indicators are used to monitor childhood undernutrition but may not supply a complete picture at a population level.
The present study compared global estimates of the prevalence of undernutrition using conventional indicators of anthropometric failure (AF; stunting, underweight, and wasting); the Composite Index of Anthropometric Failure (CIAF); and a proposed classification system called Categories of Anthropometric Failure (CAF). It also investigated the association of the conventional indicators, CIAF, and CAF with diarrheal disease as an assessment of the validity of each measure.
The study utilized the data of children from 56 low- and middle-income countries extracted from the nationally representative Demographic and Health Surveys. A total of 530 906 children younger than 5 years were included.Â
Undernutrition defined by conventional indicators (stunting, underweight, and wasting), the CIAF, and the proposed CAF classification system was assessed and compared. Six logistic regression models were employed to investigate the association between different classifications of anthropometric failure (AF) and morbidity.
The results were as follows-
These results highlight the importance of using different approaches to aid understanding of the entire spectrum of AF concerning research and development of policies and programs to address AF. The use of the CIAF and the CAF classification system may be useful for treatment to prevent AFs and could aid in meeting targets for the Sustainable Development Goal.
Source: JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(3):e221223. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1223
Comprising seasoned professionals and experts from the medical field, the IJCP editorial team is dedicated to delivering timely and accurate content and thriving to provide attention-grabbing information for the readers. What sets them apart are their diverse expertise, spanning academia, research, and clinical practice, and their dedication to upholding the highest standards of quality and integrity. With a wealth of experience and a commitment to excellence, the IJCP editorial team strives to provide valuable perspectives, the latest trends, and in-depth analyses across various medical domains, all in a way that keeps you interested and engaged.
Please login to comment on this article