Infertility affects millions of women globally, often leading to heightened stress and anxiety that negatively impact overall well-being and quality of life. Relaxation techniques, such as - Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR), Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR), Yoga, and Guided Imagery, have emerged as promising strategies for alleviating emotional distress in women experiencing infertility.
A systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of these relaxation technique interventions in reducing stress and anxiety.
For this study, electronic databases were searched for studies published up to September 2021 - using keywords related to infertility, stress, anxiety, and relaxation techniques--following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened based on predefined inclusion criteria and identified studies that assessed the impact of these techniques on stress and anxiety using validated measures.
Overall, eighteen studies met the eligibility criteria. The results depicted that MBSR, PMR, Yoga, and Guided Imagery significantly reduced perceived stress and anxiety in infertile women. Of note, MBSR was particularly effective in enhancing emotional well-being and improving coping mechanisms. Yoga provides a holistic approach by combining physical postures, breath control, and meditation to manage the spectrum of stress-related disorders. While PMR offers practical tools for relaxation, and Guided Imagery addresses anxiety through visualization techniques.
This review highlighted the potential of these accessible and cost-effective interventions in improving emotional well-being and coping skills among women encountering infertility. Healthcare providers and counselors should be encouraged to integrate these modalities into treatment plans to better support the emotional needs of infertile women – thereby enhancing their overall quality of life.
Source: Chaudhary P, Garg R K. Effects of relaxation techniques in reducing stress and anxiety among infertile women: A systematic review. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2024;11(4):521-529
Please login to comment on this article